I've never watched Harry Potter.  When it first came out I remember it being strongly preached against in my Bible-believing circles.  I heard how it glorified witchcraft, which is strongly condemned and forbidden in the Bible.  It was claimed that the author herself was a witch (although, after doing a quick research, it looks like she claims that she was only interested in the dark arts and extensively studied them in order to write the books).  Anyway... that isn't the point of this article.

Recently, as I was researching mandrakes for a sermon I was preparing, I discovered that Harry Potter apparently used some of the folklore of the mandrake by creating these characters such as the one shown above.  Without watching the movies or reading the books, I can form a few ideas about these characters based on the history of mandrakes.

First, in case you aren't sure, let me explain the background of the sermon.  I preached a message called "Trying to Get Ahead of God" where we briefly looked at the story of Rachel and Leah and their battle over who would bare the most children for Jacob.  In this story, Rueben finds mandrakes in the field and brings them to his mother, Leah.  When Rachel finds out Leah has them, she tries to make a deal with her to use the mandrakes for her own benefit (Genesis 30:14-16). 

I always assumed there was some sort of superstitious belief, or an old wives' fable that made her think that these mandrakes were going to help her situation.  After all, this same Rachel later steals her father's idols before leaving his house.  Admittedly, I don't know why she stole them, but it leads me to believe she was superstitious.  When you compare that to the part where Jacob is pealing white spots on sticks in hopes that the cattle that looked at the stick would produce offspring that were spotted, ringstraked, and speckled; you have to assume superstition was a pretty common thing in that family.

Before studying it out, I really had no idea what a mandrake was.  All I could think in my head was "mangrove" (a tree whose roots grow down into the water), and I never really looked that deeply into it.  Then, when I decided to look it up, I saw a few things immediately:

• The reason it is called a "man" drake is that the root resembles a man.
• It is a potent stimulant whose side-effects can include: blurred vision, dilation of the pupils, dryness of the mouth, difficulty in urinating, dizziness, headache, vomiting, blushing and a rapid heart rate, hyperactivity and hallucinations.
• They were often formed into amulets which were believed to bring good fortune, cure sterility, etc.
• There are legends that claimed that people who pull up this root will be condemned to hell. 
• And there were claims that the mandrake root would scream and cry as it was pulled from the ground, killing anyone who heard it.

One can quickly see why modern day fiction writers would be interested in this folklore... especially when it comes to Hollywood and visual effects.  And, for obvious reasons, this became a popular ingredient for witches to use in their concoctions (brews, ointments... "magic potions").  Because of its hallucinative properties, it was apparently used in witches' "flying potions" (I'm not sure where the notion of witches flying on brooms came from... but maybe some hallucinated and were convinced that is what they were doing).

​This doesn't necessarily prove that Rachel was superstitious or that she believed these plants had "magical power," but it seems to validate the notion that she was seeking help outside of God and taking matters into her own hand.  Like Rachel, we are often tempted to turn to the advice of worldly "doctors," drugs, old wives' tales, or (even worse) superstitious practices and "curious arts" to help get us out of a situation or to gain something that God didn't necessarily intend for us to have.

Doctors have their place, medicine has its place... but let's try not to get ahead of God and seek after things without first seeking Him and being content with such things as we have.


I'm reminded of King Asa:

2Ch 16:12  And Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease was exceeding great: yet in his disease he sought not to the LORD, but to the physicians.
  

  The word circumcise comes from two words: “Circum” meaning “around” (think about the word “circle”) and “caedere” meaning “to cut” (think about our word “scissors”).  Though circumcising a male infant might seem barbaric to some, many people continue to have their sons circumcised.  In modern times, it isn’t typically practiced as a religious conviction, but it is often considered to be a matter of hygiene... or, many times, a parent simply does it because it is what their parents did. 

​In this lesson, we are simply going to look at the significance of circumcision according to the Bible, and how it applies to us today.
 
I.             Circumcision was a covenant among the Jews.               
               A.    The practice began before the Law was given to                            Moses.
                                1.    The practice began with Abraham and                                             his house  (Genesis 17:10-14, 23-27,                                               21:4).
                                2.            The practice was expected of                                                             Moses before he received the Law                                                   (Exodus 4:26).              
                B.            It was of course given in the Law of Moses                                     (Leviticus 12:3).
                                1.            The practice had already gotten                                                       away from the children of Israel as                                                   they wandered through the                                                               wilderness (Joshua 5:1-9)
                                2.            This would apply to converts as                                                        well (Exodus 12:44, 48; ).
                                                a.            Consider the famous story                                                                 of the slaying of Shechem                                                                 and the men of his city                                                                       (Genesis 34:15-30)
                C.            It was continued among the Jews into the                                       New Testament.
                                1.            John the Baptist (Luke 1:59)
                                2.            Jesus (Luke 2:21)             
                                3.            “The circumcision” was a biblical                                                     reference to Jews (Acts 10:45, 11:2,                                                 Galatians 2:9, Titus 1:10)
                                4.            Paul (Philippians 3:5)

II.            The physical act is a picture of what should happen                      spiritually
                A.            “Circumcision of the heart” (Deuteronomy                                    30:6, Jeremiah 4:4)
                B.            “Uncircumcised lips” (Exodus 6:12, 30)

III.           The Bible makes it clear that the physical act of                              circumcision is of no spiritual value to us today.  
                 A.            This was something Paul disputed often                                           with believers of the circumcision (Acts                                          15:1-10).
                                1.            Interestingly, he did have Timothy                                                   circumcised to appease the Jews                                                       (Acts 16:3).
                                2.            This was of no value in the end.
                B.            The practice itself was of no value, even to                                      the Jews, if one didn’t intend on                                                        keeping all the law (Romans 2:25-29,
                                1 Corinthians 7:19, Galatians 6:13).
                C.            In Christ, we don’t need to identify with “the                                 circumcision” (Colossians 3:11).
                D.            Our faith is what is counted for                                                       righteousness (Romans 3:30, 4:9-11,                                               Galatians 5:6, 6:15).

IV.          Baptism is a similar symbol for believers today                              (Colossians 2:11-15).
                A.            Baptism is done out of obedience to God’s                                     command and it is a picture of that which is                                   spiritual.
                B.            Some will actually use this as an argument                                     for baptizing babies (if they were
                               circumcised on the eighth day, then why                                         should we not baptize on the eighth day?)
                C.            What they fail to realize is that circumcised                                   babies were identifying as part of a physical                                   family, but New Testament baptism                                                 identifies someone as part of a spiritual                                         family (and we aren’t born into that family                                     until we are saved).